
To me, “Hooking up” means making out or kissing at a party, much like the younger people surveyed for the Busted Halo article. Older generations, like my mom’s generation, seems to think “hooking up” means having sex, which also mirrors the results of older generations in the Busted Halo article.
One of the points in Professor Cronin's speech that stood out to me the most was when she said that in today's "dating" scene going out for coffee is a big deal, yet you can hookup with someone at a party and have it not mean anything. In our culture, kissing at a party is much more prevalent than going out on a coffee date. In fact, most high schoolers I know kiss a guy a few times before they actually go on a date with them.
The dating sequence in the high school and college culture right now seems to be: hookup at a party, then have a texting conversation, then possibly hookup more times and continue your texting conversation, then be asked out on a date (over text) which is then followed with hooking up after the date. Professor Cronin’s dating idea is so novel, yet makes so much more sense because you actually get to know someone by dating them before you hookup with them. Having a one hour dinner date can definitely bring you closer to someone than a one hour hookup.
However, the anti-daters claim that our current way of dating is just a practice for divorce seems a little extreme. Fr. Rick Malloy’s claim that “hooking up” may not work in forming relationships also seems a bit too radical. We need to revamp our dating mindsets, like Professor Cronin suggested, but even our dating practices now still form legitimate relationships that won’t necessarily lead to divorce.


